| GENRES:Nonfiction (sort of), folklore, reference
 AUDIENCE: Adults, teens; some adult situations; some graphic scenes, but
    little direct gore; little profanity.
 SYNOPSIS: This book adapts some 200 urban legends into comic form. The
    legend forms are divided into "Moving Violations" (car-related
    legends), "Wild Kingdom," "Campfire Classics"
    (the horror stories we told one another around the campfire and
    at sleepovers), "Comic Calamities," "Caught in
    the Act" (sex and scandal), "Crimes and Misdemeanors,"
    "Occupational Hazards" (business, government, and professional
    legends), and "FOAF-a-Rama" (miscellaneous). Most legends
    are told in a single page of eight or nine black-and-white panels;
    only a few legends earn two pages.
 EVALUATION: I love urban legends and am pretty well versed in them. This
    book is amusing but disappointing. The legends themselves are
    worth reading (and you have to wonder how anyone can be stupid
    enough to believe many of them). Some Ive heard told as
    jokes, not as true stories. However, the sameness of the artwork
    began to get on my nerves after a while. Youd think that
    with "200 of todays most popular comic artists"
    there would be a lot of artistic variation, but relatively few
    of the adapted legends stand out from the crowd. There seems
    to have been an attempt to emulate the old EC horror comics style
    (down to the "Good lord! <choke>"), but most
    of the contributions are too artistically bland to succeed at
    this. The storytelling is occasionally ham-handed, thanks to
    the attempt by the adapters to turn some legends into first-person
    or third-person narratives. Finally, in some pieces the story
    is not clear; the combination of art and text fails to explain
    why some things worked out the way they did. Some stories, in
    fact, are confusing if the reader doesnt read their titles.
 For the more scholarly among us, this publication has little
    in the way of interpretation or evaluation of the legends. The
    introduction by Brunvald, the man who popularized the study of
    urban legends, is just a quick history of his involvement with
    the legends, his publication history, and his approval of adapting
    the legends into comic form. Nor is there any real organization
    (subject or title indexes would have helped) within the book.
    Overall, a lightweight effort, pleasant enough in small doses. |